<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rip-off called caller ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://its4us2think.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/rip-off-called-caller-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://its4us2think.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/rip-off-called-caller-id/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: VOIP cheap or not cheap? &#171; Let&#8217;s think</title>
		<link>http://its4us2think.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/rip-off-called-caller-id/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>VOIP cheap or not cheap? &#171; Let&#8217;s think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://its4us2think.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/rip-off-called-caller-id/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] BW blog has a blog on how VOIP is not the cheapest option for calling international. However, I feel that going VOIP is not just about international calls, it provides more options for the same buck(s). I just got a mailer from AT&#38;T saying that their prices for calling features would increase, Call waiting would cost $4 (3.43 currently) and caller ID would cost $8 from $6.17 ( I dont know how their cost increased, thats why I call it rip off). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BW blog has a blog on how VOIP is not the cheapest option for calling international. However, I feel that going VOIP is not just about international calls, it provides more options for the same buck(s). I just got a mailer from AT&amp;T saying that their prices for calling features would increase, Call waiting would cost $4 (3.43 currently) and caller ID would cost $8 from $6.17 ( I dont know how their cost increased, thats why I call it rip off). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
